Skip to content

Canonical Timeline

Why this chapter matters

A timeline gives the corpus a horizon without pretending that every future event is settled. This chapter distinguishes proposal, decision, event, correction, and unknown so readers can feel the story's movement without mistaking narrative order for authority.

Return to the Canonical Document Registry to see how the living corpus records its current state.

Purpose

This standard defines a public timeline that distinguishes verified events, testimony, reconstruction, adoption, contest, and mythic or cultural interpretation. Sequence is useful for orientation, but chronology alone does not prove causality, authority, or truth.

Normative clauses

  • CANON4-R001: Each public timeline entry SHALL identify its time basis, source, status, scope, uncertainty, and owning record.
  • CANON4-R002: Verified event, Architect testimony, reconstruction, adopted canon, contested account, and mythic account SHALL remain distinguishable.
  • CANON4-R003: Corrections, late evidence, disagreement, and supersession SHALL append without silently rewriting the earlier public history.
  • CANON4-R004: Future scenarios SHALL not be presented as current fact, and private identity or sensitive operational detail SHALL not be inferred from narrative gaps.
  • CANON4-R005: Timeline entries SHALL preserve provenance, privacy, minimisation, accessibility, and review conditions.
  • CANON4-R006: A consequential historical claim SHALL link to the relevant memory, decision, provenance, or authority record.
  • CANON4-R007: Timeline review SHALL identify missing periods, competing accounts, causal claims, correction state, publication scope, and the evidence required for revision.
  • CANON4-R008: Future scenarios, mythic interpretations, testimony, reconstruction, and adopted canon SHALL retain their declared status in every derivative presentation.
  • CANON4-R009: Timeline narrative SHALL NOT disclose private identity, sensitive operations, or create retroactive authority through coherence.

Review method

Editors should separate event time, observation time, recording time, publication time, and correction time. They should identify missing periods, contradictory sources, and causal claims that require separate reasoning. A timeline may use narrative form, but its evidence status must remain recoverable to an independent reviewer.

Failure handling and boundaries

Historical erasure, fabricated certainty, presentism, retroactive authority, myth presented as fact, identity exposure, and causal claims based only on sequence require correction and review. This Draft does not publish a completed founding history, establish future events, disclose private scenarios, or authorise external publication.

Operating model and interpretation cases

Timeline review separates event, observation, recording, publication, and correction time, then links each claim to source status, uncertainty, memory, provenance, decision, and authority records. Narrative can aid orientation while evidence status remains recoverable. Missing periods and competing accounts remain part of the public history where disclosure is safe.

  • Conforming: Time basis, status, source, uncertainty, corrections, missing periods, and linked records are explicit.
  • Prohibited: Narrative coherence upgrades myth or testimony into verified fact.
  • Boundary: Future scenario remains clearly separated from current history.
  • Failure: Contradiction or late evidence appends and narrows the claim.
  • Loophole: Retroactive authority is implied through a seamless chronology.
  • Misuse: Timeline gaps disclose private identity or sensitive operations.
  • Care-control: Historical narrative supports repair and continuity while preserving dignity and correction.

Design evidence

Timeline review should reconcile time basis, source status, event versus recording time, uncertainty, missing periods, competing accounts, corrections, provenance, privacy, and linked authority or decision records. Narrative coherence cannot upgrade myth, testimony, or reconstruction into verified fact.